GITTA-Logo
PDF Version of this document Search Help Glossary

Lesson Navigation IconLayout Design Settings / Graphical Semiology

Unit Navigation IconMap Size and Scale

Unit Navigation IconDefinition and Organisation of Map Elements

Unit Navigation IconTypography

Unit Navigation IconColour Design

Unit Navigation IconReadability Rules

LO Navigation IconBalance of Map Elements

LO Navigation IconContrast Design of Visual Tone

LO Navigation IconGraphic Density

LO Navigation IconShape Readability

LO Navigation IconAngular Readability

LO Navigation IconReadability of Colour Patterns

LO Navigation IconLand-Water Contrast

LO Navigation Iconwhiteboard discussion

LO Navigation IconTest your knowledge about readability here

Unit Navigation IconMap Critics

Unit Navigation IconSummary

Unit Navigation IconRecommended Reading

Unit Navigation IconGlossary

Unit Navigation IconBibliography

Unit Navigation IconMetadata


GITTA/CartouCHe news:


Go to previous page Go to next page

Graphic Density

Graphic Density is another aspect of graphic semiology mentioned in (Bertin 1967). The bottom line of his achievements states: The readability of maps is conversely proportional to the amount of represented cartographic information. That means, the more elements you have, the less readable they are. Two or three additional and thus readable maps should always replace one overloaded and difficult to understand map. An optimal quantity of cartographic elements per cm2 is needed in order to achieve a readable and comprehensible map.
If the graphic density of cartographic elements is too high, the readability will be badly affected. This means: The outcome of high density is just a sum of graphics where all detailed bits-and-pieces of map elements are mixed together. This mixture is mostly insignificant for the map user. In contrast to this, presenting too little density, the graphic expression will be underdeveloped.

Ideal is a graphic density of 10 elements or signs per cm2. It is necessary that the element density be considered on your map. You can either decrease the number of graphic variables or modify the map scale if the density is too high.

The Maximal Graphic      Density of 1 cm2The Maximal Graphic Density of 1 cm2 (Bertin 1967)

Two map examples of India, taken from the "Graphic Semiology" of J. Bertin depict this difficulty. In map A you can see a too high density, e.g. The orange square in this case represents an area of 1 cm2. The graphic information is not significant here. In map B a correct density of elements is shown. The information here is legible and thus significant.

Top Go to previous page Go to next page